TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a upright piano lower limit price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that such price agreements intend to encourage competition among retailers in the beas of node service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after universe dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a eccentric , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by prosecute in anticompetitive price fixing . The District solicit opinionated in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . butt D . Park Sons Co , which held that authorization price agreements are per se black under the Sherman Act . supplicant , in an appeal to the U .S .
Court of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this regularize was based on outdated economics and contended that a the reign of reason is a better legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not ill egal for a manufacturer to set mandatory min! imum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you exigency to get a full essay, dictate it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment